SelfSigned
⚠️ SelfSigned
issuers are generally useful for bootstrapping a PKI locally, which
is a complex topic for advanced users. To be used safely in production, running a PKI
introduces complex planning requirements around rotation, trust store distribution and disaster recovery.
If you're not planning to run your own PKI, use a different issuer type.
The SelfSigned
issuer doesn't represent a certificate authority as such, but
instead denotes that certificates will "sign themselves" using a given private
key. In other words, the private key of the certificate will be used to sign
the certificate itself.
This Issuer
type is useful for bootstrapping a root certificate for a
custom PKI (Public Key Infrastructure), or for otherwise creating simple
ad-hoc certificates for a quick test.
There are important caveats - including security issues - to
consider with SelfSigned
issuers; in general you'd likely want to use a
CA
issuer rather than a SelfSigned
issuer. That said,
SelfSigned
issuers are really useful for initially bootstrapping
a CA
issuer.
Note: a
CertificateRequest
that references a self-signed certificate must also contain thecert-manager.io/private-key-secret-name
annotation since the private key corresponding to theCertificateRequest
is required to sign the certificate. This annotation is added automatically by theCertificate
controller.
Deployment
Since the SelfSigned
issuer has no dependency on any other resource, it is
the simplest to configure. Only the SelfSigned
stanza is required to be
present in the issuer spec, with no other configuration required:
apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1kind: Issuermetadata:name: selfsigned-issuernamespace: sandboxspec:selfSigned: {}
apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1kind: ClusterIssuermetadata:name: selfsigned-cluster-issuerspec:selfSigned: {}
Once deployed, you should be able to see immediately that the issuer is ready for signing:
$ kubectl get issuers -n sandbox -o wide selfsigned-issuerNAME READY STATUS AGEselfsigned-issuer True 2m$ kubectl get clusterissuers -o wide selfsigned-cluster-issuerNAME READY STATUS AGEselfsigned-cluster-issuer True 3m
Bootstrapping CA
Issuers
One of the ideal use cases for SelfSigned
issuers is to bootstrap a custom
root certificate for a private PKI, including with the cert-manager CA
issuer.
The YAML below will create a SelfSigned
issuer, issue a root certificate and
use that root as a CA
issuer:
apiVersion: v1kind: Namespacemetadata:name: sandbox---apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1kind: ClusterIssuermetadata:name: selfsigned-issuerspec:selfSigned: {}---apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1kind: Certificatemetadata:name: my-selfsigned-canamespace: sandboxspec:isCA: truecommonName: my-selfsigned-casecretName: root-secretprivateKey:algorithm: ECDSAsize: 256issuerRef:name: selfsigned-issuerkind: ClusterIssuergroup: cert-manager.io---apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1kind: Issuermetadata:name: my-ca-issuernamespace: sandboxspec:ca:secretName: root-secret
CRL Distribution Points
You may also optionally specify CRL Distribution Points as an array of strings, each of which identifies the location of a CRL in which the revocation status of issued certificates can be checked:
...spec:selfSigned:crlDistributionPoints:- "http://example.com"
Caveats
Trust
Clients consuming SelfSigned
certificates have no way to trust them
without already having the certificates beforehand. This becomes hard to
manage when the client of the server using the certificate exists in a
different namespace. This limitation can be tackled by using trust-manager
to distribute the ca.crt
to other namespaces. The alternative is to use
"TOFU" (trust on first use), which has security implications in the event
of a man-in-the-middle attack.
Certificate Validity
One side-effect of a certificate being self-signed is that its Subject DN and its Issuer DN are identical. The X.509 RFC 5280, section 4.1.2.4 requires that:
The issuer field MUST contain a non-empty distinguished name (DN).
However, self-signed certs don't have a subject DN set by default. Unless you manually set a certificate's Subject DN, the Issuer DN will be empty and the certificate will technically be invalid.
Validation of this specific area of the spec is patchy and varies between TLS libraries, but there's always the risk that a library will improve its validation - entirely within spec - in the future and break your app if you're using a certificate with an empty Issuer DN.
To avoid this, be sure to set a Subject for SelfSigned
certs. This can be
done by setting the spec.subject
on a cert-manager Certificate
object
which will be issued by a SelfSigned
issuer.
Starting in version 1.3, cert-manager will emit a Kubernetes warning event
of type BadConfig
if it detects that a certificate is being created
by a SelfSigned
issuer which has an empty Issuer DN.